manifestation list

manifestation list
Is this the right way to write the patent claims?

I invented a new game and want to patent. There are several ways to play this game entirely described by claim 1 I of the concept, but offer no concrete manifestation. In claim 2 of the I list several specific embodiments. Is this correct or do I have a concrete embodiment in the setting – an independent claim, anyway? (I did it before in a different category, but I received no response. Apology to those who receive this question twice.)

The correct way to write the patent claims, it is with someone who has a good education and credentials to get the first shot and has been spared the agony of going flubbing your protection. It should look like, a couple of patents for such things, and be sure to understand what is already patented. Then take your invention and the preliminary search of a patent attorney, without disclosing it to others (rights to a patent impact IS). You can often file a provisional patent application in a matter of minutes after a full description and drawing of the invention, and no claims are up a complete record, which was later filed (after payment of the principal licensing or investors for the construction of your patent portfolio) required. If nothing is worth more, you'll know sooner or later, but better do it at a later date and not later the Patent Office. Yes, You need a broad claim or two and then some specific details of various methods or devices that are implement the invention. No, it is not just easy to describe, "concept", because a concept can not be patented, only an embodiment may. We can not say: "I would say that the concept of a game like that …", but you can say:" I plead for an X process, comprising the steps A, B, C "or" I keep a device for X components A, B and C, then add entries to the elements, D, E, F, and different Alternatives A, B and C.

The Secret Law of Attraction

The Webs #1 Law of Attraction Resource W/2700 + Articles